

When news broke that AI coding startup Windsurf had been acquired by Google for $2.4 billion, the tech world lit up. But as the details surfaced, excitement gave way to skepticism, then frustration.
Here’s the catch: Google didn’t buy the whole company. They acquired 40 people. Specifically, 40 top engineers, including the CEO, Varun. The remaining 250-plus employees were left behind, marooned in a shell company with $100 million on the balance sheet and no clear path forward. That is, until startup Cognition stepped in over the weekend to acquire what was left.
It’s part Silicon Valley drama, part ethical dilemma, and part warning. This moment reveals the shifting realities of startup success in 2025—and who benefits when value is created.
Windsurf’s outcome isn’t an isolated event. It’s part of a growing trend, especially in AI, where big tech firms bypass traditional acquisitions. Instead of buying customers or products, they’re going straight for technical talent.
Peter Walker of Carta described these as “acqui-hires by any other name.” In the Windsurf deal, Google didn’t want the IP. They didn’t want the customers. They only wanted a handful of engineers and researchers. The rest? No interest.
To some, it’s ruthless efficiency. To others, like Asad Zaman, it’s a betrayal. “This was not just bad optics,” he said. “It was a founder deserting his team.” Sam Jacobs took a more measured view. “If you're making a billion dollars, you can afford to take care of people. But should we expect that? That’s the question.”
Equity has long been the great promise of startup life. Take a pay cut now, reap the upside later. But Windsurf’s structure turned that on its head.
Many of the employees left behind had joined in the past year. Their stock options hadn’t vested. The deal wasn’t a formal acquisition, so there was no trigger to accelerate their equity. In the end, their ownership amounted to nothing.
Even worse, the team didn’t get the chance to join Google, nor could they cash out alongside their CEO and investors. As Walker pointed out, these licensing-style deals are designed to sidestep the usual equity protections—and they’re becoming more common.
The takeaway: in today’s startup landscape, your upside depends less on the company’s success and more on how your leadership chooses to handle it.
Windsurf had $82 million in ARR, which should be a sign of strength. But after the top technical team exited, the company's value dropped dramatically. Why? Because in AI, recurring revenue doesn’t always mean lasting value.
Asad and Peter argued that without ongoing technical innovation, even enterprise contracts could quickly unravel. Sam pushed back, saying enterprise buyers go through real procurement processes. “If the product is embedded, that revenue shouldn’t disappear overnight.”
Still, it raises a critical question. If a developer tool loses its core team and can't evolve, will enterprise customers stick around? The Windsurf case suggests the answer might be no.
The Windsurf saga is unfolding in the middle of what many see as another tech bubble. AI startups are raising massive rounds, sometimes without products. Investors are hungry, valuations are climbing, and large companies are scrambling to secure top talent before the next breakthrough hits.
In this climate, employees have less leverage than ever. Hiring at startups is down. Equity protections are weakening. Technical talent is being cherry-picked. And founders, flush with secondary payouts, aren’t always incentivized to look out for the broader team.
The implications run deep. If a startup can succeed without its go-to-market team, finance org, or product roadmap, what does that mean for the people who do that work? And if capital-rich acquirers can now buy talent without accountability, how should employees protect themselves?
Some hope this will prompt a shift in how equity and exit outcomes are handled. Monthly vesting schedules, deal-triggered bonuses, and more transparent terms could offer some protection. But change will be slow, especially for employees who lack negotiating power.
Others believe the real solution lies in founder behavior. As Zaman put it, “If I’m making $500 million, I can carve out a bit to take care of the team.” That decision, however, depends entirely on the founder’s character.
In Windsurf’s case, Cognition’s acquisition softened the blow. But it doesn’t erase what happened—or the risks others may face if this becomes the new standard.
Windsurf’s story isn’t just about one CEO’s decisions or one company’s fate. It’s a window into how power, value, and fairness are being redefined in the AI era.
This deal worked for investors and a small group of engineers. But it left hundreds of employees behind, questioning whether the system is designed to reward only the few. The tech world talks a lot about alignment and shared upside. But when it mattered most, those ideals fell apart.
And maybe that’s the lesson. In a world where value is created by teams, not just founders, we need to think more critically about who gets rewarded when lightning strikes.
Listen to E118 on Spotify or Apple. New episodes drop every Sunday and Thursday.
This episode also unpacks:
Key chapters:
Subscribe to the Topline Newsletter for fresh insights on go-to-market strategy, emerging trends, and real benchmarking data that keeps you ahead of the curve.